Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 3621 - 3640 of 8,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2014, 6:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Leaving for another day a decision on the lawfulness of an electronic communications policy that prohibited employees from using Purple Communication’s email system for any nonbusiness reason, a three-member panel of the National Labor Relations Board set aside representation elections at two of the employer’s sites because of campaign speeches given by Purple’s president/CEO and its maintenance of an overbroad no-disruption policy that could… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
The possibility for employees to perform work that is related to or complimentary to their main work is established with the payment of the corresponding salary. 7.- Salary. [read post]
On February 7, 2020 the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) sued the State of Oregon in federal court seeking a declaratory judgement to invalidate a state statute that protects employees who refuse to attend lawful compulsory meetings held by employers during organizing campaigns from adverse employment action. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
., 361 NLRB No. 41 (Sept. 8, 2014, just posted on Westlaw) (some paragraph breaks added): The National Labor Relations Board has considered objections to an election held March 14, 2013, and the hearing officer’s report recommending disposition of them. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
The National Labor Relations Board has issued advice on social media policies. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The only argument the tribe presented in its defense was that the Board lacked jurisdiction because the application of the NLRA would impermissibly interfere with the tribe’s inherent tribal sovereignty to regulate labor relations on its tribal lands. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:19 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
 However, a recent Trump Board decision, Oberthur Technologies, 368 NLRB No. 5, issued on June 17, signals a probable change in the Board’s governing case law on this issue. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:40 am by Ronald Meisburg
  In Register Guard, the Board had held that employers could bar employee use of the employer’s email for non-business purposes, including union or other communications protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, so long as the employer did so on a non-discriminatory basis. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:26 am by Jeffrey Berman and Nick Clements
  On that day, a divided National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) ruled “not so. [read post]
In another long-anticipated decision, on July 21, 2020, in General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127 (2020), the Board replaced three context-specific rules for determining whether certain abusive conduct committed by employees is protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) with the Wright Line standard that is traditionally used to assess whether an employer’s conduct is discriminatory under the Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fixico Member, National Council on the Humanities 12/29/00 Sue Ellen Wooldridge Solicitor, Department of the Interior 05/28/04 Peter Schaumber Member, National Labor Relations Board 08/31/05 [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:35 pm by Mike Delikat
Following criticism from the judiciary, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced this month it is now seeking input on the scope and applicability of this protection. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:44 am by James J. La Rocca
Critics of the rule saw it as a blatant attempt by the USDOL to discourage employers from retaining labor consultants and, in turn, facilitate union organizing drives particularly in light of recent pro-union actions by the National Labor Relations Board, including its new expedited union election rules. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:29 pm
  A similar issue when dealing with the National Labor Relations Act is whether an employee is a professional or a supervisor. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:12 am by Eugene Volokh
SFR, Inc., the National Labor Relations Board (Members Kaplan, Prouty & Wilcox) affirmed Administrate Law Judge Arthur Amchan's decision that participating in Black Lives Matter protests wasn't sufficiently focused on employee rights: Specifically, we agree with the judge that the employees' participation in Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests was not shown to be for mutual aid or protection in the context of the facts here and under extant law;… [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:53 am by Epstein Becker Green
By Paul Burmeister*  The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has ruled that negotiations between the Hotel Bel-Air and UNITE HERE Local 11 were not at impasse when the employer implemented its last, best final offer, which included severance payments to union employees. [read post]