Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 14,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Oct. 2, 2019) succeeded with a mootness claim because they did three important things. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
The typical case doesn’t involve aggression. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:25 am
Administrative exhaustion defense – no, it doesn’t exist. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:38 am
As always when the facts have not been tested in a trial or hearing, we can’t be sure what really happened. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:16 am
Another answer is that they can’t help themselves. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : Dans une affaire de violence conjugale et postconjugale, la juge de première instance a commis 2 erreurs de principe en omettant d’évaluer correctement le risque que l’imposition d’une peine avec sursis à l’accusé poserait pour la collectivité; une peine d’emprisonnement de 6 mois est substituée aux 10 mois restants de la peine d’emprisonnement avec sursis… [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Les déclarations de culpabilité reposant sur le dépôt en preuve du revolver, il faut déterminer en l’espèce si cet élément de preuve a été obtenu par suite de la violation de droits garantis à M. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
[2] Légalisée par le Parlement dans la foulée de l’arrêt Carter[1] rendu par la Cour suprême en 2015, l’aide médicale à mourir est strictement encadrée au pays[2]. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
” In a commentary about the bond offering last month, S&P indicated the deal wouldn’t have met its standards for a triple-A rating. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:34 pm
" That couldn't be right: that my result was insignificant didn't save it from the laws of math and logic. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
You can sort of see where this is headed, can't you? [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 4:57 am
Artículo 2.- Modifi car el artículo 2 de la Ley N° 30341 Modifícase el artículo 2 de la Ley N° 30341, Ley que fomenta la liquidez e integración del Mercado de Valores en los términos siguientes: “Artículo 2. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm
App. 12/17/2010) Judicial override (10-2 for life) to death. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
The motion failed when the board deadlocked 2-2. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 6:16 pm
The label read: "1 or 2 tablets every 3 hours as needed for pain". [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:43 am
§12101(b)(2)). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Sec. 1.170A-14(g)(6), the Court of Appeals also addressed paragraphs (g)(1) (perpetuity), (g)(2) (remote events), and g(3) (subordination) of the regulation in its opinion. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
QUESTION: There have been issues that residents don’t feel comfortable bringing up at the board meeting (open forum). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:51 pm
If you don’t have the brief and want it, hit us up offline. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
This case is a perfect example of the rule we have previously espoused, that it is important to remember that you, not your employees, are responsible for what goes on in (and what goes or doesn’t go out of) your office. [read post]
