Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am
Because Smith had not been properly appointed, she found that he was not entitled to use the “indefinite appropriation” established by the Department of Justice. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
He dissented from the Court’s 2003 opinion in US v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:43 am
It necessitates precise drafting of clauses by transaction lawyers so as to obviate any ambiguity. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 5:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:06 pm
Finnis references Begum v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
The Court then wrapped up: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
See Cox v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:18 am
The Judge in the present case therefore considered the precise scope of Mayne Pharma disclosure. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:04 pm
Downs v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:26 am
[viii] At a minimum, they should meet the policy standards adopted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) that inform federal government contracting IT compliance requirements, and which are often followed by state and municipal governmental agencies,[ix] along with the standards propagated by agency-level AI Governance Boards. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
But, that his statement lacks his customary precision. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
On the evidentiary dispute, concerning the use of statistical evidence, the government — like Tyson — relied upon the Court’s 1946 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The case isn’t intriguing because the issue of striking jurors because of their race is new; the case is intriguing precisely because three decades since the Supreme Court made clear that prosecutors (and the rule has since been extended to all lawyers in all cases) cannot use race as the basis for even a single peremptory challenge (in Batson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
They concluded that long-term monitoring violated the defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy, without regard to the precise technology installed or used by the government. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Feltman, No. 1:08CV371, 2008 US Dist. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's Sup Ct Watch list for 4/3 Conf hereØ SCOTUSblog's Petitions to Watch for 4/3 Conf hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
