Search for: "People v. House" Results 3621 - 3640 of 11,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state House of Representatives has already passed the bill, but it now goes back to the House because of two changes in wording made by the Senate. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  And you people think I don’t have a life.) [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed one such case in Perkins v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
In R (on the application of Wilson) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
In R (on the application of Wilson) v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
With so many long-suffering people now experiencing the unfamiliar (and probably uncomfortable) sensation of joy, it falls to the experts at Relist Watch to spring into action and bring back the reassuring embrace of disappointment. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:25 pm
Yet today, its historic decision in Gideon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
  * Privacy in focus: urban life watching is art in New York StateValentina writes on Foster v Svenson, an Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court decision regarding people taking pictures of their neighbours. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  You could make the same argument about those:  while it would be unreasonable for me not to expect people to walk past my house and look at it, is it reasonable to expect that someone will be watching my house 24 hours a day for a week or so? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Based on this report, the Ministry of Justice, in cooperation with the Legislative Department of the Cabinet, drafted a bill that passed the Upper House on 19 April 2006 and the House of Representatives on 15 June 2006. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
Oregon implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
An officer monitored the house for several days and became suspicious at the number of people he saw entering and leaving. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Art 8 was not relied upon.Briefly, the appellants all own houses near to a new relief road in Brigend. [read post]