Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 3621 - 3640 of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
But circumstances do arise where people are so incompatible that they simply cannot live together. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary continues on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:23 pm by Power Trial Lawyers
This article will cover Assembly Bill 600, California’s Racial Justice Act (AB 256), Penal Code 1172.1, Penal Code 1170(d) (People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
The problem is that people believe the fix was in, that this wasn’t an opinion with which most people disagreed, like Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
The Patent Act gives patentees a limited exclusionary power, and exhaustion extinguishes that power. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
While Top 50 power lists must be taken with a grain of salt as they are necessarily based on historic and ongoing power imbalances, so many people on this list deserve recognition for their good works.]Vu Le: “Evil-looking man: Finally. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As a contribution to the Issue on the fiftieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
5 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Ilya Somin
In a recent article, Atlantic writer Jerusalem Demsas explains why blue states that want to give refuge to people fleeing abortion restrictions enacted by red states if Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Those disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision in the ACA cases have searched for a silver lining in an otherwise devastating defeat: five justices would prohibit the Commerce power from reaching inaction, a Machiavellian CJ Roberts took the long view, that this is the Chief's Marbury v. [read post]