Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 6,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In Thoburn v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am
After publishing the original $6,900 limit in Revenue Procedure 2017-37, Congress changed the rules on inflation adjustments as part of “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018” (the Act), Pub. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Nearly all laws classify people into groups, but the Constitution places restrictions on the ways in which these classifications may operate. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Nearly all laws classify people into groups, but the Constitution places restrictions on the ways in which these classifications may operate. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
The provision in question, Section 1806(f) of FISA, establishes procedures for people to seek to suppress FISA evidence that will be introduced against them. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that invade the… [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:40 am
Net result: the court will conduct a jury trial solely to set the amount of damages. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
As held in the case of People v Grinberg, chemical analysis is necessary for a prosecution under Vehicle and Traffic Law for driving while ability is impaired by drugs. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
As also is evident, this case is indistinguishable from People v Zanghi. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 1:39 pm
It just refers to the opinion and gives Kennedy sole credit for it, erasing the presence of O'Connor and Souter. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:46 am
Hall v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
In last term’s Sessions v. [read post]
