Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 3621 - 3640
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to defend in… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 2:28 pm
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:26 am
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal appeals court to rule that Title VII encompasses sexual orientation discrimination in Zarda v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
Patchak v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Last week, I had the honor and privilege of being admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer holding a… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit [Docket #15-1177] considered the issue of summarily removing a public… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
The first was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:43 pm
Many of these individuals sought asylum in the United States based on a credible fear of persecution. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
Reilly (2001) (tobacco advertising); United Staets v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
United States, or credit terms in Catalano Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday morning in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:44 am
Because we disagree, we affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm
(It is also worth mentioning that the Bar Pro Bono Unit arranged for some pro bono advice and representation by Robert Brown of Arden Chambers. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
How, Roberts asked, does the negotiation of wages not affect the state budget? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
