Search for: "STATE v. DANIEL" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
”  At Forbes, Daniel Fisher discusses the inevitable “broccoli question. [read post]
15 Jun 2025, 5:01 am by Frank Cranmer
Replying to the debate, the Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs, Daniel Zeichner, said this: “Let me be clear from the outset: it is the Government’s preference that all animals should be stunned before slaughter. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
President Daniel Noboa has been faced with flagging approval ratings amid rising violence weeks before a referendum that could affect his prospects for re-election next year. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of JEWELRYSUPPLY.COM: No tacking and not enough 2(f): In re Jewelry Supply Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of the “Eddie Bauer Guarantee” for failure to function as a service mark: In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC (TTABlog) TTAB dismisses fraud-based opposition for failure to prove intent to deceive: Daniel Ryan Way and CMDW, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2025, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
In a study of state nondelegation doctrines, Daniel E. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm by ZMan!
STRICT AND INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT In the United States Supreme Court case of Kansas V. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm by Dan Bushell
For one, state supreme courts, led by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]