Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 3621 - 3640
of 6,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2012, 8:52 am
§ 499e(c)(2); In re Magic Restaurants, Inc., 205 F.3d 108, 111-12 (3d Cir. 2000). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
In Rodgers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm
Building on that decision, the Plaintiff in Lee v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am
The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York seeks to forfeit and return the Bataar skeleton to Mongolia after having prevented its sale at auction this past spring. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 12:16 am
V. [read post]
Construction Defect – When can diminution in value be used as damages in a construction defect case?
4 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
Ray v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840 [1987]; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887 [1982], lv denied 56 NY2d 507 [1982]). [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
S. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:44 pm
[i] Whitaker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
In New Jersey, an appellate panel in Denike v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
In New Jersey, an appellate panel in Denike v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
Upon one joint tenant's death, by operation of law, the other tenant receives 100% of the deceased party's interest upon the recordation an affidavit and certificate that proves the joint tenant's death. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
Canadian Indemnity Co v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Latimer v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
It also rejected Laiwala’s claim that the Court of Appeals earlier decision in Chrisman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
In Seong Yun Ko v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
Golf Assoc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
tsf actions remain core under §§548 & 544. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HellerEhrman-BK-ND-CA-Montali-9-28-11.pdf … D-TX: Per Stern, BK Ct can't dismiss nondbtr intervenor (& BK Claimant) allegations of fr. inducement in dbtr's BK acq. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/AIHAcquisitions-ND-TX-McBryde-9-7-11.pdf … SDNY: No mand. abstention vs GT per §1334(c)(2) also bec suppl. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:09 pm
C-12-1233 EMC (N.D. [read post]
