Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 3621 - 3640 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm by Danielle Citron
It’s difficult to see how the group and its various permutations warrant the breathless admiration of journalists who dub them “hacktivists. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
Karo, the Supreme Court held that placing a "beeper" (a primitive tracking device akin to a lo-jack) inside a can of ether did not violate the 4th amendment, as the beeper was placed in the can in public, belonged to the DEA, and was only used to monitor the suspect in public, where he could be watched by the police anyway.As with any 4th amendment case, the issue is whether there has been an unreasonable search or seizure of the defendant. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
Their answer will bring Fourth Amendment law into the digital age, addressing how its 18th-century prohibition of “unreasonable searches and seizures” applies to a world in which people’s movements are continuously recorded by devices in their cars, pockets and purses, by toll plazas and by transit systems. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by Andrew Stine
If the person left evidence laying out in the open, the search and seizure may be passed as legal and warranted. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
Knotts, decided 30 years ago, In the Jones case, the government argued in a brief to the Supreme Court that the Knotts case disapproved of only “widespread searches or seizures that are conducted without individualized suspicion. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:46 am by Susan Brenner
Lainhart began a protective sweep to secure the house in anticipation of obtaining a search warrant. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:11 pm
If not, then Tyre Wade may have have a viable defense in his case in challenging his Search & Seizure. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Not that search and seizure law is crystalline in its clarity at present, but at least there’s one clear marker:  if the police violated the 4th Amendment, the evidence gets thrown out. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
  And turned an otherwise permissible stop into a violation of the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
A warrant for the seizure of the domain names was made the same day. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by Michael DelSignore
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution gives every American the right to not be subjected to illegal search and seizure. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:24 am by Patrick Luff
But that somewhere else can only be the exercise of a constitutionally protected right (whether we want to call it a Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures or a Fifth Amendment Right against self-incrimination), and surely the exercise of a constitutional right cannot be a sufficient condition for a judge to find probable cause. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm by Susan Brenner
So Gomez had standing to challenge the search and seizure. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-1413Issue(s): Whether all of the evidence seized pursuant to search warrants should be suppressed under the exclusionary rule, where the executing officers believed that the warrants imposed no meaningful limits on the items that could be seized and, consistent with that belief, seized a substantial volume of items not covered by the warrants.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In addition, law enforcement agents today executed search warrants at 11 locations and seizure warrants of 28 bank accounts related to the alleged fraud schemes. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In addition, law enforcement agents today executed search warrants at 11 locations and seizure warrants of 28 bank accounts related to the alleged fraud schemes. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:03 am
August 30, 2011): The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The same Third Court of Appeals already ruled it wasn't - even by more lax, pre-Gates standards - and that Judge Barbara Walther, the same judge who issued the search warrants in question, abused her discretion in approving DFPS' seizure of FLDS kids. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm by David Kravets
At issue is a Jan. 31, 2006 lawsuit, and others that followed, alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment right to be free from warrantless searches and seizures. [read post]