Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 6,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The goal of the sellers is to maximize profits by selling worthless goods.Fake Meryet Amun statue placed in evidence in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
To be struck down, the law must violate a provision of the applicable Federal or state Constitution.A recent example of this principle showed up in Fite v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 11:20 pm
Art lawyers are abuzz with the controversial decision that allowed an art collector who placed a winning bid at an auction to back out of the transaction unscathed. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The case is Cooper v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:04 pm
But last week, in NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Bowman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:06 pm
By Jason Rantanen Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
D’Addario & Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:44 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
The case is Kransky v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:02 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court will resolve the issue in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:29 pm
The Florida Supreme Court recently decided Jackson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
Jenack Estate Appraisers and Auctioneers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Justice Kennard also says that sellers of downloadable products can take preventative measures against fraud. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
(on the facts of Bertovich v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:09 am
The Virginia Supreme Court unfortunately ruled in Kiser v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
A case in point: In the recent well-publicized case of Feldberg v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
., v SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
