Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
Look to the Islamic State group and the almost routine videos of beheadings available online. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
The court does not lay out a definitive test for determining the character of the social media account (business or personal?) [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
See, Scott James Preston, Whistleblowing in Intercollegate Athletics, University Business, March 28, 2012, (discussing Glenn Hedden v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Clark v Jeter, 486 US 456, 461 (1988). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court quoted the case of Secretary Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm
The “cleaning” work that Bristol Cleaning was required to do under the contract is said to be of a different character than the “repair of damage” work that is also required to be done by GC 2.4. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
(iv) There was no damage to the distinctive character of the CTM through the use made by the defendants (v) [since] there was no infringement, she decided it was unnecessary to decide the question of whether the "own name" defence applied.Both parties appealled and the appeal was heard in November 2014. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Moreover, in such cases, the enhanced distinctive character of the mark may play a role in increasing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In its March 25, 2015 decision in Halioris v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
Prince and Blanch v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
One of the characters, António Baptista, emigrated to the United States and made his fortune there. [read post]
