Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, heard 12 November 2020 R (on the… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and… [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 12:23 pm
when I read this snippet from a report about Live Earth: Given a choice of four major issues before the United States today, 36% named the war in Iraq as most important. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:38 am
Heard, 491 F.2d 1, 4 (5th Cir.1974), rev’d on other grounds by McLaughlin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
It was a quieter day at the Court yesterday, where the Justices heard oral argument in two cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
March v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:54 am
It’s rare for legal malpractice or Judiciary Law § 487 claims to be heard in Surrogate’s Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 1:49 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:48 am
The answer is yes.The case is Sutton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
See Fields v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
In Foskett, Peters and Waschckuhn v Ezeugo [2018] EWHC 3694 (QB), three Judges applied for the committal to prison of a man who had repeatedly breached a harassment injunction made in their favour. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:49 pm
The cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) that will be argued in January are: Quarry v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 2:43 am
(Kilker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Sandifer v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Along the way, Spaw heard them talking about innocuous subjects such as their children’s activities, taking a nap, and evening plans. [read post]
