Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 3621 - 3640 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2015, 2:52 am by Ben
Graham’s images. 1709 readers will remember Mr Prince from the 2013 U.S. case of Cariou v Prince where Mr Prince largely succeeded with his fair use defence after 'transforming' Mr Cariou's photographs of Rastafarians in Jamaica. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
Screenshot of Thuỵ Vân from Nổi gió Thuỵ Vân in her starring role in the Vietnamese war film Nổi gió First page of the manuscript of String Quartet No.1 by Alfred Hill String Quartet No.1 by Alfred Hill is in the public domain in New Zealand, but not in the U.S. … [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm by Marta Requejo
In such a scheme, Mr Kolassa only has a claim against his bank and cannot be regarded as the holder of the securities. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:21 pm by LTA-Editor
However, the use of this machine was kept under the radar until this past December when the Tenth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
  In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm by Alex Ely
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee began the first of two day-long hearings on the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
In last week’s ruling, the appellate court affirmed the denial of dissolution under BCL § 1102 but reversed the grant of common-law dissolution and dismissed the petition, stating: “[T]he remedy of common-law dissolution is available only to minority shareholders who accuse the majority shareholders and/or the corporate officers or directors of looting the corporation and violating their fiduciary duty” (Matter of Sternberg [Osman], 181 AD2d 897, 897-898; see… [read post]