Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
Here’s my big problem with all of these bills: people are giving up incredibly valuable No-Fault protections (even if most aren’t even aware how important these are until it will be too late); but these sacrifices are being made without any built-in safeguards, protections, or guarantees to prevent insurance companies from continuing to charge excessive auto insurance premiums to Michigan consumers. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
We can no longer lecture the world on the “rule of law” when American citizens don’t have the right to have the laws passed for their protection enforced correctly and are instead relegated to secret corporate tribunals with no right of appeal. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(IP Directions) Things are looking up! [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
There’s nothing magical about copyright protection that makes it only limit the ability of consumers getting free movies. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:12 am
" (The court doesn't discuss the issue of whether Arenas' name, as a personal name, is entitled to trademark protection at all.) [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am
Ellison v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
If that doesn't make the hair stand up on the back of your neck, then you just aren't paying attention.3. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
The ECJ's ruling in Google France that neither the sale nor the use of terms protected by trade marks as keywords constituted a per se trade mark infringement didn't help them -- but that was a "5(1)(a)" case, where same goods/same mark (double identity) infringement was alleged. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
They also know that every single individual consumer isn't going to sign up for arbitration. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Dunham v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:52 pm
These decisions include NAACP v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:43 am
Miller v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Yet the Supreme Court’s decision last Term in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
. – When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:22 am
Kids and privacy: the FTC is revising its COPPA rules Analysis after the jump.AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm
Without much fanfare, Facebook has taken steps to protect its rights in the LIKE marks, and I don’t think LinkedIn is going to like it since both sites have “Like buttons” (though Facebook’s includes a thumbs up icon, while LinkedIn’s just says Like). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
And, like its previous preemption opinions, the Court elevated principles of contractual autonomy over state law consumer protection regulations. [read post]
