Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 7,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
” U. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:22 am
Disciplinary probationFeliciano v Safir, Supreme Court, [Not officially reported]Garnett v Safir, 253 A.D.2d 700, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 92 N.Y.2d 817The Feliciano Case:Although the specific events underlying the Feliciano case are but rarely encountered, the decision demonstrates that an employee’s “disciplinary probation status” may follow the individual to a new agency upon his or her transfer if the new employer wishes to… [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
We recognize that certain decisions of this Court may have been interpreted as standing for the proposition that a party's failure to disclose its experts pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness, by itself, requires preclusion of an expert's affirmation or affidavit submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:59 am
Scherr v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:12 pm
Moyer, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent example is the case of Marchand v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
D/B/A U-HAUL, U-HAUL CO. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In 1971 the U. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In 1971 the U. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Singh v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:28 am
SH Synergy, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Morales, 527 U. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
In opposition, Con Edison argues that Armienti’ s representation of Con Edison for purposes of the continuous representation doctrine continued until the execution of their Consent to Change Attorneys on April 13, 2015 (Complaint, In a given case, the Consent to Change Attorney may reflect the erid date of an attorneyclient relationship, in the absence of other evidence that establishes an earlier date (see Louzoun v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
LEXIS 1468, 2016 NY Slip Op 30727(U), *10 [NY County 2016]). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Black v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 584 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am
The IPKat team wishes the new IP Minister a productive, informative and long tenure in the role.European Commission's written intervention in HMD dispute reinforces Huawei v ZTE criteria in GermanyBack in April, the European Commission submitted written observations as an amicus curiae in the VoiceAge EVS v HMD Global dispute which is pending before the Munich Higher Regional Court (6 U 3824/22). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm
Ct. 1986) (reversing holding that owner’s monkey was not a domesticated house pet); Turudic v. [read post]
