Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2019, 8:50 am
In Wadler v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Finally, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted Under Armour’s motion to compel the dispute to arbitration. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
To a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:39 pm
In Wadler v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:39 pm
In Wadler v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:50 pm
Judge Orrick followed these and other federal court decisions in ruling that Section 1373 is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
Gersh v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
As the court explained: That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
GMR punched back by filing its own lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging anti-competitive behavior by the RMLC. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
In response to someone who asked, “I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Here's what Michelle writes:"The Review Board of the United States Copyright Office has affirmed a decision of the Registration Program to deny registration for Cartagz, Inc.'s attempt to register a text claim in a work. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am
On the basis of these principles the United States Copyright Office has a presumption against the registration of blank forms. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:01 am
“That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death,” the Supreme Court said in its decision Monday. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:10 am
In Rotkiske v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
The primary precedent with which the court grappled is Rostker v. [read post]
