Search for: "United States v. Cooper" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:10 am
Oct. 15, 2010), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently concluded that Office Depot, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
The government's dismissal of a criminal information against UBS filed in Florida-- United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
Emanating from Guantánamo yesterday:News stories reporting rumors that the military commissions case of United States of America v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am by Durga Rao
In the only United Kingdom case in which this section has been successfully invoked, Mayer v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
’ (PatLit) PCC Update 1: new regime, new judge, old case, old rules: Technical Fibre Products Ltd & Anor v Bell & Ors (PatLit) Formula 1 fight for right to race as Nelumbo Nucifera (IPKat) Summary judgment, but no quick fix on costs: Patents County Court decision in Nike International Ltd & Ors v Bateman (IP finance) United States US Patents USPTO announces launch of second peer to patent pilot program (Inovia IP) (IP Watch) (IP: KCE)… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Although the United Kingdom Government has opted in to Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December, 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, the rules relating to applicable law will not apply in the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Antitrust Today
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]