Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 3621 - 3640 of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Generally, however, public employees may assert official immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
Or, in the case of the United States, the structure of the reform process means almost nothing gets passed. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:25 am by Jeffrey
Next week could initiate the foreclosure of the class-action system as we know it, because that's when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will hear arguments in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Larry Ribstein
Margaret Sachs has a good analysis on the Glom. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 4:56 am by Jani
Finally the matter arrived in the open arms of the United States Supreme Court, which issued is ruling on the question a bit over a month ago (discussion of the earlier decision can be found here).The case of Alice Corporation v CLS Bank International dealt with Alice Corporation's patented method of mitigating 'settlement risk', which is the uncertainty of whether only one party will pay what it owes to another, by the use of a third-party. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 8:04 pm by Sean Hanover
We think this is bad law, and contrary to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]