Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
Traditionally we instruct jurors every day, don't talk about the case, don't read about it in the newspapers etc. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:37 am
Now we will work toward eliminating a percentage of that larger number by using the system for felony pre-charges, bond hearings, progress hearings or just about anything where the trial rules don't require an in-person appearance. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:37 am
" My hunch is that this sort of analysis would yield less than 20 "national" law schools, though I don't know of anyone who has tried it. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
" My view is that talking frankly with one's own children about sex—and taking the view that sex toys don't need to be hidden—is a choice that a court generally shouldn't second-guess, even in the context of a dispute between parents. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
"I don't see any reason to believe that any of the judges had moved away from our position. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 3:50 am
For Further Reading: The better argument, we think, is Judge Pregerson's dissent. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:07 am
We don’t hate cops. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
”In a fingerpointing match as old as time, God supposedly answered the complaint pro se, and attributed all responsibility for any wrongdoing to his nemesis, Satan.We’re not quite sure what to make of the Senator's chutzpah.We don’t know whether his hubris is a function of his 37 consecutive years in the senate (a reign which will end in 2008 because of term limits) or if there was something strange in that cornhusker’s water,… [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
” Id. at *8.Of Note: Ever feel like we’re making up federal sentencing law as we go along? [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 7:25 am
Because we don't know at this point what the circumstances were on the night in question, dismissal on qualified immunity grounds is plainly inappropriate. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:18 pm
The tests provide a clear dividing line that removes the dreaded element of judicial discretion from determinations of constitutional violations, and lawyers don't trust judges enough to leave it up to their good judgment. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 10:11 am
Often a defendant will attempt to show that its product is essentially the same as the prior art — and offer the conclusion that either (1) we don’t infringe or (2) the patent is invalid. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:23 am
And if they don't, then isn't it appropriate to criticize or praise lawyers for their choices of clients? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm
You don't just hear a rumor. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
We might say that such a person is "empty-handed" or "unarmed," by which we mean not that he actually has no arms (unless he actually doesn't and then we are just being mean) but rather to indicate that he has no weapons. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm
Getting past all the "don't forget to turn out the lights"* comments to David Rothman, the investiture of Judge Kevin Emas at the 3rd DCA was a great one, as our Captain reports:The Captain Reports:Emas Investiture ......The first three loaded the bases. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 2:55 am
We don't judge, we just fight. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
It's often said that we don't try cases in the media. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:25 pm
They don't understand it. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:34 am
We can't pre-judge. [read post]
