Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 60,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 8:43 pm
This March, it overruled federal pre-emption of state law in Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
And this article in turn builds on, among other things, work I undertook on ISL more than two decades ago. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:13 pm
“The upcoming trial of United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
News Flash - the Supreme Court issued a decision in Pacific Operations Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
Court rejects attorney’s claim that public funds were wasted because he was qualified and would have done the legal work for substantially less moneyMatter of Diederich v Lawrence, 2010 NY Slip Op 07850, Decided on November 4, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAttorney Michael Diederich Jr., a resident of Rockland County, sued the Rockland County Solid Waste Management Authority contending that Authority had “wasted taxpayer money” by paying a law firm,… [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:21 pm
" It pointed out that the tradition in the United States has been for works to be created, copyrighted and then revert to the public domain. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:45 am
In 2003, the Appellate Division addressed this question in the case of Schulze v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
Instead, the federal government makes and administers federal laws without forcing the states to do some of the work for them. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds yesterday’s State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
As we have learned in the Supreme Court’s Opinion in Coito v Superior Court, the work product protection may be either absolute or qualified. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:17 pm
Turning to the administrative/production worker dichotomy discussed in Bell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
According to the tribunal in Saipem v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
But perhaps there’s also a change in standard pratice at work. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:34 am
This means the courts are still working through the City law to determine what it means.The case is Makinen v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:20 pm
NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
