Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 3641 - 3660 of 140,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 7:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The client has no recourse, no matter how bad their lawyer screws up, under the Supremes' latest hit to defendants' ever-waning constitutional protections. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 2:04 pm by Louise Melling
After a long summer of protesting to affirm to the nation that Black Lives Matter, we saw the Confederate flag on parade in the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:19 pm by ocgdev
This type of trust makes sense for somebody who is not receiving, and does not plan to receive, public assistance. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
 Now notice that the Act of Congress creating the Second Bank does not invoke any affirmative powers. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm by Andrew Vey
Simply because a term is new does not mean it will confer anything of value. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:18 am
Or, does the artist leave me and the 1st producer/instrumentalist, OFF of the SR form. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:19 pm by The Dear Rich Staff
Or, does the artist leave me and the 1st producer/instrumentalist, OFF of the SR form. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
The 6th Circuit held unanimously that a high school teacher’s First Amendment claim that she was terminated in retaliation for exercising her free speech rights fails as a matter of law because First Amendment speech protections do not extend to... [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:25 pm by Daniel Nazer and Daniel Nazer
First, Canonical’s trademark “policy” does not and cannot trump the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Just because you've been involved in a car accident, slip and fall, dog bite, or you're in pain does NOT mean that you have a injury case which has merit. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:24 pm
The opposing view that the First Amendment does NOT require FOIA rests partly on a negative right/positive right distinction: The Constitution forbids government interference with private expression but does not demand that government facilitate expression by revealing information that the government holds secret. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  Can they leave matters up in the air without specifically dealing with a repudiation by the other side? [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:42 pm
First, one could argue that a general defense-related appropriation statute does not authorize the ongoing hostilities because it provides only general defense-related funds and does not indicate any approval of the specific hostilities at issue. [read post]