Search for: "Application of Stevens"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
” Steven King, Oprah Winfrey, etc. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:21 pm
No statistical model could have predicted them," notes Steven J. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
A regulation of speech that has a substantial number of its applications that don’t make sense is unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
So concluded the Court in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Stevens, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer (who also wrote a separate, concurring opinion). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
Jones affirmed that Georgia’s business judgment rule is applicable to the actions of bank directors and officers. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Steven T. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:36 pm
The Court of Appeal found this was not a complete conversation with counsel, based on Stevens c. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, strict application of rules without the occasional creation of ad hoc exceptions fosters predictability, but may undermine even-handedness when the rule maker fails to anticipate how a one-size-fits-all rule unfairly lumps together some people who are not similarly situated. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:55 am
Drinker Biddle Lawyers Switch to Stradley Ronon
The Legal Intelligencer
Former Drinker Biddle & Reath partner Kenneth Greenberg and of counsel Joan Ohlbaum Swirsky joined Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young late last month. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, in a case involving the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause to Puerto Rico in 2016, the odd couple of Justices Ginsburg and Thomas joined together in a concurrence to suggest that the separate sovereigns exception should be eliminated or substantially narrowed. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
” And that presumption surely makes sense here, for as Justice Stevens recognized years ago, “[b]oth Title VI and Title VII” codify a categorical rule of “individual equality, without regard to race” . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:29 am
This same report included some other drugs that remain under a cloud of suspicion and/or are the subject of current litigation efforts, including Epogen and Procrit (possible contamination with lamellae); Gemzar (liver toxicity); Keppra (linked to Stevens Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis); and Actos (rhabdomyolysis). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Speakers and moderators include: Sharon Marsh, Keisha Hylton-Rodic, Alexander Wilson, Steven Emmert, Teresa Rea, James Bikoff, David Kappos, and many others. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On the one hand, Steven Salop, Professor at Georgetown University Law School, argued that courts should adopt the Philadelphia National Bank approach to labor restraints, asserting that this standard would treat workers as consumers and would not allow courts to consider traditional downstream consumer benefits, such as lower prices, to balance the harm to workers. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:53 pm
Toobin dwells on Justice Stevens’ complaint that the Court’s broad holding in Citizens United was unnecesary, as the Court could have held for the petitioners on narrower, statutory grounds. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
See also Steven Stark, 42 U. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:04 am
., that only one of these theories of legitimacy could be correct for a given domain of application. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
In fact, Hamdan I is a specific application of a far deeper principle articulated in a long line of cases with respect to when abstention and/or exhaustion of military remedies is unnecessary. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
“Not surprisingly, given the political pressures they face, judges are far more likely than juries to impose the death penalty,” Justice John Paul Stevens wrote in a 1995 dissent from a decision that upheld Alabama’s capital sentencing system. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
Obviousness Ultimately, following a thorough statement of the applicable principles on the law of obviousness, and a lengthy analysis of a number of issues relating to each of three pieces of prior art, Mellor J held that on the correct construction of Integer A, Claim 1 was not obvious (interestingly, he said that on Astellas’ own proposed construction, Claim 1 would have been obvious). [read post]
