Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The Court stated in passing that the counter was required to be at least 36 inches in length, a misreading of the relevant standard.* Boitnott v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:12 am
 Specifically, via US v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
III State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
“The citizens of the State of New Jersey are bound to obey a law that the state doesn't want but that the federal government compels the state to have. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:05 am
Olvera v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:49 am
The appellate court stated: In Vaden v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:32 pm
ShareAnyone looking to the oral argument in Cameron v. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 5:35 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am
Also at The National Law Review, Rafael Reyneri looks at PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:07 am
Last week, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Therasense v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:48 am
State Supreme Court Justice Bruce D. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:43 pm
The appeals court likewise held it was bound to follow the decision under the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:21 am
See Lu v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:45 am
If there's a contractual licence, remember that a licensee's acts are bounded by the limits of what is licensed, not by the scope of the IP right itself. [read post]
