Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 31,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:41 am
Expert's report in context Regina (A) v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 12:32 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:18 am
In SMO (A Child) v Tiktok Inc. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:44 am
On Monday in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:09 am
Garcia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:02 am
L.B.G. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Turner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:47 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
C.J.M. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 5:40 pm
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Luu v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
See Shoup v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 7:18 am
So, the fair hearing has a higher burden of proof than the initial investigation (fair preponderance of evidence v. some credible evidence). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:04 pm
Defendant's sentence for coercing and enticing a minor to engage in sexual activity and possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) for purposes of applying a two-level enhancement for misrepresentation of identity, the district court reasonably could have concluded that defendant was misrepresenting his identity in a prolonged effort to groom what he thought was a thirteen-year-old girl for illicit sexual contact; and 2) a vulnerable victim enhancement, and an… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:13 am
Allegations and Findings in Related Family Court Matters Are Not Judicially Noticeable and a Child’s Receipt of a Public Benefit Through a Parent’s Eligibility Does Not Preclude a Putative De Facto Custodian from Qualifying as a Primary Financial Support Diana Skaggs Tue, 11/12/2019 - 10:13 Read more about Allegations and Findings in Related Family Court Matters Are Not Judicially Noticeable and a Child’s Receipt of a Public Benefit Through a Parent’s… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:08 am
Trial Court Did Not Err in Relying on Unpublished Opinions as Persuasive Authority; Husband Did Not Owe an Arrearage on Child Support Accrued While Husband and Wife Were Cohabitating in an Attempt to Reconcile Their Marriage – Published Opinion from Kentu Diana Skaggs Tue, 11/12/2019 - 10:08 Read more about Trial Court Did Not Err in Relying on Unpublished Opinions as Persuasive Authority; Husband Did Not Owe an Arrearage on Child Support Accrued While Husband and Wife Were… [read post]
