Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 13,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Naval officer. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
The Law Offices of John C. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
Bolden v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
Bolden v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Pratt v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:50 am
In SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:53 am
Anne-Kristin Fricke, in her capacity as spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court on civil-law cases, confirmed that the court still plans to hand down decisions in, technically, ten Qualcomm v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:34 am
The court applied the four-part test for excusable neglect articulated by the Supreme Court in Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Plaintiff brought an action before the court and sought the forfeiture of a motor vehicle as an instrumentality of a crime, particularly, a 2000 blue BMW, pursuant to the NYC Administrative Code. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:14 pm
Supreme Court’s January 12, 2018 order in the case of Raymond James Lucia v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:00 am
Refusal to be an "informant" protected by the First Amendment Burns v Martuscello, USCA Second Circuit, Docket No. 15-1631This decision appears to be one of "first impression" concerning "speech and speech-related activity as protected by the First Amendment" by the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, and while the parties involved were, respectively, a prisoner and prison administrators, it may signal that public employees… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:33 am
" CSEA also contended that the Office of Court Administration’s decision “violates Civil Service Law §115. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
In the pending case of Microsoft v. i4i, the Supreme Court must decide whether the Federal Circuit’s requirement of clear and convincing evidence is proper for an invalidity defense, even though the prior art relied upon by the Defendant was not considered by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:22 am
Hewel v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
