Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:15 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:45 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen remarks that Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:22 pm
Davis). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
Davis, 116 N.J. 341, 361 (1989) (quoting State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2018 Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics [2018] EWHC 2572 (QB) (heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Although initially regularly consulted by Confederate States President Jefferson Davis, Stephens was soon sidelined due to his policy disagreements with the more nationalistic Davis, and was tasked with diplomatic efforts that attempted to make peace with the Union. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
This appeal will consider inter alia whether the convictions of Stubbs and Davis for murder and attempted murder were rendered unsafe by (i) the trial Judge’s handling of evidence at trial or (ii) the trial Judge’s directions to the jury. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
Davis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
See also Roper v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:02 am
Davis (1965) 62 Cal.2d 791, 80. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
On the record before us, plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for legal malpractice. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
