Search for: "DAVIS V. STATE"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 5,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
In a dissenting opinion, Senior Judge Davis succinctly explained why the majority’s “crabbed plausibility analysis” was wrong: 3. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:27 am
In Adair v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
D, Iain Sharp, Michael Allan Martin Davies, Denis Mazeaud, Albert A. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:54 am
Summary of Decision May 17, 2013 Justice Davis delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:09 pm
Wong, and also as stated in Chandi v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
In fact, the Court in 1986 in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:15 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:45 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen remarks that Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:22 pm
Davis). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
Davis, 116 N.J. 341, 361 (1989) (quoting State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2018 Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics [2018] EWHC 2572 (QB) (heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018). [read post]
