Search for: "Doe VI " Results 3641 - 3660 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
Many times, people who have prior drug convictions are fighting an addiction problem; a prior drug felony could also be as an accessory or in another situation that does not make the defendant a menace to society. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:32 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Second, and more importantly for the issues covered by this blog, I'm flat-out astonished at the investigative path that led the FBI to Petraeus, and in particular the outlandishly sweeping electronic surveillance powers exhibited by the FBI - with and without a warrant - vis a vis Broadwell's gmail account(s), to which Google apparently gave them unlimited back-end access.The Washington Post on Saturday ran a story detailing the sweeping nature of the FBI's… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by familoo
The highlights (and I do paraphrase here): The judiciary’s proposal vis a vis timescales for care proceedings is NOT the same as the Government’s 26 week proposal. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by familoo
The highlights (and I do paraphrase here): The judiciary’s proposal vis a vis timescales for care proceedings is NOT the same as the Government’s 26 week proposal. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:04 am by Jim Gerl
Doe 484 U.S. 305, 108 S.Ct. 594, 559 IDELR 231 (1988). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:33 pm by Kurt Holzer
  It may also be to blame if it does not maintain the truck fleet or doe not following drug testing protocol. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A 122Pursuant to A 122(1),(2) a request for re-establishment of rights shall be granted provided that an “applicant” was unable to observe a time limit vis-à-vis the EPO, in spite of “all due care required by the circumstances” having been taken. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:24 pm by ihwiner
The analysis is not complete, however, without a brief discussion of some applicable legal ethics rules (and, yes, some may think that’s an oxymoron) which are supposed to guide an attorney’s ethical conduct vis-a-vis their own clients and other parties. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
On May 12, 2006, Plaintiff’s secondary coverage, Tricare, denied the remaining claim for $1,234.00 “due to lack of response of [sic] the third party liability questionnaire” vis-à-vis medical malpractice; and Plaintiff was referred to Ms. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:37 am by DDowd
However, failure of the owner to abide by the terms of any such agreement does not relieve the occupant of the responsibility to maintain the smoke detection devices in a fully operational condition at all times. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 pm by Kevin Funnell
The pendulum does not swing back without a little push. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:30 pm
That disqualifies Nurse Willersdorf from testifying vis-à-vis “bed alarms” in the pending Burrell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:18 am by John Palley
   veto or direct trust distributions;                         vi. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The term does not include: (I) A person selling or trading secondhand property so long as such property was not originally purchased for resale and so long as such person does not sell or trade secondhand property more than five weekend periods in any one calendar year, as verified by a declaration to be prepared by the seller. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The term does not include: (I) A person selling or trading secondhand property so long as such property was not originally purchased for resale and so long as such person does not sell or trade secondhand property more than five weekend periods in any one calendar year, as verified by a declaration to be prepared by the seller. [read post]