Search for: "Fields v. People"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2019, 5:50 am
We remember the playing field feeling that little bit more level. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am
Fisher also said that Hamdi v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:59 am
Campbell v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:15 am
The OECD's website announcing adoption expressed the hope that the "OECD AI Principles set standards for AI that are practical and flexible enough to stand the test of time in a rapidly evolving field. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” However, he explained, to interpret the term “increased risk” in the statute, courts should rely on “the relevant medical field. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
But any specialization, including a specialized prosecutorial practice, requires a commitment to a field, a community, and an ideal. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
MG, one of the first people on the scene of the collision after it occurred, called the 911 emergency number at 2:01 A.M. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
As the Foxcon and FIFA examples demonstrate, globalization is everything but a static and well-defined phenomenon, a complex process that involves a plurality of actors and a multitude of fields. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
There would be mayhem on the field and injuries to players. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
But the fact nonetheless is that the definition of "customer" which excludes feeder fund investors is not in the SIPA statute, but goes back, as near as I can tell, to the 2d Circuit court of appeals opinion in early 1976 in SIPC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
See HH Judge Parkes QC in Donovan v Gibbons [2014] EWHC 3406 (QB) at [6] and Warby J in Ames v Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127 (QB) at [55]: “….there may be circumstances in which one would naturally expect to see tangible evidence that a statement had caused harm to reputation, but as practitioners in this field are well aware, it is generally impractical for a claimant to seek out witnesses to say that they read the words complained of and thought the… [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 11:50 am
Helen's talk exposed a divide between the IR people and the privacy advocates. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
