Search for: "Hall v. State"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 3,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:02 pm
These were the issues discussed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its April 5, 2017 decision in Hall v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:15 pm
No, “Justice” Scalia, I won’t “get over” Bush v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:31 am
While free speech isn’t shed at the school yard gates, as the Supreme Court held in Tinker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:40 pm
More recently, in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm
United States: “The door of a court is not barred because the plaintiff has committed a crime. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Later this year the Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear the appeal of R. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
In Farley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
Back on PatLit, David Berry considers liability for "divided" patent infringement -- and how a recent US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in BMC v Paymentech has avoided tackling it full-on. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
Applying the reasoning used by the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google ([2016] QB 1003) there is a strong argument that section 32(4) should be disapplied pursuant to article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the grounds that it conflicts with the rights guaranteed by the Charter, namely the right to respect for private and family life under Article 7 and the right to protection of personal data under Article 8. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
Seal Beach Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:32 pm
Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
Qualcomm v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
In Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
French ‘3 strikes’ law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
The owner also maintained that Philadelphia zoning ordinances do not specifically prohibit sexual activity on the premises.The majority challenged MAJ's attempt to prove its first argument by citing as precedent a case where the state Supreme Court ruled that off-track betting was an accessory use to a restaurant. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:50 am
Julie Cohen: Coded v. tacit - not quite clear on the distinctions. [read post]
