Search for: "High v State"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Ross; Moore v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 794 (08 July 2011) Hossack, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWCA Civ 788 (08 July 2011) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 798 (08 July 2011) Relational LLC v Hodges [2011] EWCA Civ 774 (07 July 2011) Fox v Foundation Piling Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 790 (07 July 2011) MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793 (07 July 2011) The… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:54 am
Affirming a state district court, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that an African-American state employee failed to present sufficient evidence that health plans offered in certain ZIP codes were inferior and that those inferiorities resulted in an adverse impact (Cartwright v State of Nebraska, August 9, 2013, McCormack, M). [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Revel, Enzo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Ryan and Trevino v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:22 pm
It could be made a crime, but the state’s high court says that the state “peeping Tom photographer” statute just doesn’t cover it. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
The only question is how high the judgment amount will be. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:52 am
The state high court reversed, noting several issues. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:53 am
On the Mareva injunction, the Singapore High Court adopted the majority approach in the Privy Council decision of Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 am
The state high court rejected that reasoning. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear BG Group PLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
Matt Bittle of the Delaware State News reports that in Rauf v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
First Instance decision At first instance the case was brought to Foskett J at the High Court by SOCA, stating that the Mr Perry had been convicted of dishonesty offences in Israel and those offences could be linked to substantial sums of money which Mr Perry and his family had held in their various UK bank accounts. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:53 am
State Farm decision by the judge. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
From 1965 to 1980, on average 84% of the justices attended the State of the Union Address. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
Similarly, in “Camp v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
The Court was swift in rejecting that basis for decertification: "Recently, the state's high court issued its decision in In re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298 (Tobacco II). [read post]
