Search for: "In re Davis" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm by Claire Hill
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article, Daniel E. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
TPM says, if McCain gets elected, You’re In Danger (Why? [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Schnabel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Cross-border transactions, Foreign firms, Internal Revenue Code, Inversions, IRS, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities Regulation, Spinoffs, Target firms, Tax avoidance, Taxation, Treasury Department Statement from Commissioner Piwowar on Regulation S-K Posted by Michael S. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Kate Mancuso
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK Sanctuary efforts for undocumented immigrants are “evolving” in parallel with the anti-sanctuary movement, wrote Professor Rose Cuison Villazor of Rutgers University School of Law and Professor Pratheepan Gulasekaram of Santa Clara University School of Law in a forthcoming article for the UC Davis Law Review. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:04 am by Jonathan Bailey
There are 7.8 billion humans on this planet and it’s inevitable that we’re going to have overlaps in our ideas. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
Davis, one of the most prominent appellate practitioners of all time.) [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
” In an essay for the UC Davis Law Review, Jane Bambauer, a professor at the University of Arizona James E. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684 (14 June 2011): Mother who changed her story re father’s role in child abuse fact-finding hearing forced to disclose notes of lawyers’ advice. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:20 am by Steve Hall
“In California the people may be willing to support the death penalty in principle but they’re not willing to fund it. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:47 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Fourth District Court of Appeal Reverses Trial Court in Broward Auto-Accident Appeal Davie Police Identify Men Involved in Possible Wrong-Way Driving Accident Supreme Court of Florida Answers Certified Question Regarding Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
These resulting penalties are the costs of re-prosecuting the defendant a second time and the ensuing delay by the eventual appeal which would deny fair, swift and certain justice, under an administrative cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by SHG
There is some merit to Dorf’s contention, in that Title IX prohibition against sex discrimination in education never provided cover for any of this beyond the authority provided by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:07 am by SHG
” When you’re “100% certain” that if you lose, people are going to die, best to kill them first, right? [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:42 am by Stéphane Erickson
  Cross-jurisdictional guides Our guide on government relief programs announced in light of COVID-19 Publication date: April 1, 2020 Guide to COVID-19: Government Relief Programs in Canada Our first guide to assist clients who are navigating unprecedented layoffs during the global pandemic Publication date: March 26, 2020 Cross-jurisdictional guide of layoffs in Canada   National webinars on COVID-19 Special webinar edition discussing new measures on access to federal wage subsidies and… [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  They’re beginning to think: if we add what you know to what we know, we may end up with a fuller, better picture. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:32 am by Broc Romanek
SEC Brings First Regulation G Enforcement Action: Abuse of Non-GAAP Measures Some big news from Davis Polk: Last Thursday, the SEC announced settled charges against SafeNet, Inc. and certain of its former officers and employees in connection with an alleged earnings management scheme that materially misstated SafeNet's GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. [read post]