Search for: "In re Miller "
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
On May 7, 2015, the Sixth District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion addressing numerous issues of interest under CEQA’s “fair argument” test for preparing an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
“We’re making that decision now,” Biden told reporters. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
., etc.Title Insurance: CALIFORNIA FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS ARBITRATION IN TITLE INSURANCE DISPUTE, In re Cal. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
” (Quoting In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1161-1162.) [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
On November 7, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion mostly upholding the EIR for a 48.75-acre, 328-unit residential infill project (known as McKinley Village) against various CEQA challenges, and finding the Project to be consistent with the City of Sacramento’s general plan. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
” (Citing In re Baycol Cases I & II (2011) 51 Cal.4th 751, 762, fn. 8.) [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
In a published opinion filed August 19, 2021, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court that found fault with the EIR for an improvement project within the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument portion of the Angeles National Forest. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Hacked Off has re-published lessons from the phone hacking scandal: 10 years on, first published on Campaign.org. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the judges in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union therefore erred when concluding that the triggering of Article 50 “is a bullet that cannot be withdrawn. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:38 am
If you’re looking for a riding partner, to help build/design a trail, or just info on the local MTB trails… this is where you want to be. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the… [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
But see In re Miller, 418 F.2d 1392 (CCPA 1969) (finding a functional relationship between volumetric indicia and the measuring spoons on which they were printed). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:32 pm
However, the ire of most of these papers was directed less at the judges than at MPs and Remainers such as Gina Miller. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
Everybody feels as if we’re rolling in the same direction. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Miller told the parties that while the panel opposed delaying oral argument, they would wait to issue an opinion in the appeal until the Supreme Court ruled. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
In the public figure/issue context, a public issue is something you're supposed to be interested in, and a private issue is something you're not supposed to be interested in. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:16 am
., In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, and In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, cut back at the viability of classes certified under Rule 23(b)(1) or 23(c). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:48 am
http://onforb.es/sDJZOf (Matthew Nelson) You’re Being Sued. [read post]
