Search for: "Jackson v. State" Results 3641 - 3660 of 6,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
But before jumping into the Top 10, a couple LXBN notes: Zosha writes up why the growing trend of legal representation for the unborn might be dangerous, and Young v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am by Kelly Buchanan
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Daniel Tims, No. 109,472 (Jackson)State appeal (petition for review)Kevin P. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:31 pm by Daily Record Staff
After assaulting his then-fiancé Nicarsia Jackson on two separate occasions, Willie Wright was convicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County of two counts of second-degree assault and one count of reckless endangerment. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
The opening paragraph of Lord Reed’s leading judgment allowing the appellant’s appeal in Jackson v Murray sets the scene for what follows: “A school minibus draws up on a country road on a winter’s evening. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:53 pm by Jon Sands
(His pro se filings in state court cited neither In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), nor Jackson.) [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 Because the English Court had jurisdiction over the defendant it has no power to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see Owusu v Jackson [2005] 1 QB 801, ECJ). [read post]