Search for: "Lee v. State " Results 3641 - 3660 of 5,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Patent and Trademark Office, and been replaced by interim Director Joseph Matal, one might not immediately recognize this as one of the bigger cases of the term, argued under the caption Lee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
  And at casetext, Josh Lee argues that, just as the Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
” North Carolina militia leader Michael Lee Wells testified that Three Percenter group chats included calls to start “taking out” civilians in Democratic areas, as the “only way to stop the rioting. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]