Search for: "Level v. State" Results 3641 - 3660 of 29,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” As originally enacted, RFRA applied to all levels of government, but in the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am by Whitney Hodges
California’s Statewide Cannabis Regulatory Scheme California has a dual regulatory scheme for cannabis licensing – meaning licensure or permitting is required at both the state and local level. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
This is left to the national courts and the Member States to ensure it is in place. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
This is left to the national courts and the Member States to ensure it is in place. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm by Philip Segal
The United States contains more than 3,000 counties, and state court records are stored at the county level in most cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:41 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
” While the Salary Transparency Law itself is brief and leaves many questions unanswered, the Commission’s guidance (the “Guidance”) provides some level of clarity and compliance information. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Further, it argues that the existing tests should be thought as levels of scrutiny. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 9:08 pm by Daniel E. Walters
The Court’s decision in the latest of these cases, West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 11:51 am by Eric Goldman
Ideally, however, the FDA will create a safe harbor that allows properly labeled vegan products and, even better, preempt all of the nonsense legislation that’s been enacted at the state level. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Winner’s conduct did not rise to the level of frivolous within the definition of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see Rojas v Hazzard, 171 AD3d 819, 820; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]