Search for: "Mark E. Howe" Results 3641 - 3660 of 7,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Osgoode) WIPO and the future of IP (IP Osgoode)     Global - Trade Marks / Brands Trade mark portfolio management software: market survey (Class 46) Trade mark licences: Beware of the unconventional – Australian case Pacific Brands Sports & Leisure Pty. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:33 am by Sophia Tang
So, how these elements are utilized in the judicial system? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:45 am by SO Issues
Such findings condition how we read some constitutional language. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:23 am by admin
  For example, a notice of a contest should not require readers to take an active step, such as sending an e-mail or placing a phone call, in order to obtain the required information. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(PLI)   US Patents Constitutional separation of powers (Patently-O) Patent practitioner ethics update (Patently-O) Interesting claim on Big 3 patents – discussion of Detroit New editorial by James E Malackowski (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Lawyers getting patents: what should the rules be? [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:25 pm
Combine this idea with the E-Myth and you’ve got a recipe for winning (not Charlie Sheen style either). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 10:45 am by Christopher Danzig
Turns out your handy dandy E-Z Pass can have a similar effect. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm
” Users can create custom stamps and water marks as well – and Bates-number documents. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:43 am by Andrew Appel
**e-mail from Robert Giles, Director of the NJ Division of Elections, to Stephanie Harris, October 11, 2018. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This test case complements T 1553/06 (see the preceding post), in particular by considering whether the contents of e-mails are made publicly available by the fact that e-mails can be intercepted. [read post]