Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3641 - 3660
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
By Mark Ladov and Inimai Chettiar. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:56 am
The insurer appealed the trial court decision and the state appellate court relied partially on the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Chauvin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
Did you know that in 1935 applicant built the world’s largest grand piano, for the Silver Jubilee of King George V and Queen Mary? [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
"The Board found the mark to be at most suggestive of the goods. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
" United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers the justices’ denial of review in Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
Mark A Karl, No. 33211, slip op. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
This provides: "Unless otherwise provided in this Regulation, a Community trade mark court shall apply the rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark in the Member State in which the court is located. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
