Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
United States , __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), the D.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 10:31 am
” Ghost Adventures “provides ghost tours and related hospitality services across the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
’ Declaration of Mark Keenheel, attached to § 2255 Motion as Exhibit 2 at ¶ 2.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:33 am
Niehoff, et al. was decided and issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 25, 2011. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:31 pm
Constitution does under Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
United States Department of StateShare this: || Join EFF [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
United States, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:42 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:31 am
Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm
Rosetta Stone press release (April 10, 2012): "Rosetta Stone greatly appreciates today's opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
Mark Moore, argued that appeal.) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm
Lyle has also kept our readers up to date on election and civil rights laws, clarifying the fine points of cases like Citizens United and NAMUDNO v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
This represents a significant departure from the longstanding United States patent law giving the first person to invent a device priority over all others. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
