Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 3641 - 3660
of 16,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 6:56 am
But it didn't matter, because when I continued to the next page, I saw this:They need the photo ID uploaded. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:46 am
” Paperless trials and for that matter, paperless motions, reduce court time, because counsel, witnesses and the judge don’t have to search through volumes of documents to find the correct document. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:39 am
Don't count on it. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
In the court’s words: The [Confrontation] Clause does not, however, ‘bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
Grimaldi First Amendment test requires the trademark owner to show “that the defendant’s use of the mark is either (1) ‘not artistically relevant to the underlying work’ or (2) ‘explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the work.'” It doesn’t matter if the artistic work isn’t that great or is being sold commercially. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Estoppel to Assert Statute of Limitations Adequately Alleged And Can’t Be Ruled Out On Facts Alleged As A Matter Of Law On Demurrer After reciting the familiar standards of review on [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:46 pm
It does not matter if you feel all right and don’t have visible severe injuries or no injuries at all. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Words matter and the consequences of words (not just the intentions behind words) matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
So, if Just Crack an EGG is suggestive for meal kits, this creates a strong incentive for the brand to keep the mark on the inherently distinctive side of the line: “[T]aking a suggestive name, mark, or tag-line, and using it descriptively in a sentence on labels, packaging, ad copy, or the internet, unfortunately can move it to the left (and wrong) side of the line and render it merely descriptive. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
” In an interview posted on the Pacific Legal Foundation blog, Mark Miller discusses “how the COVID-19 pandemic could affect the cases currently before the Court and the constitutional issues that the Court is deliberating. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 12:53 am
[Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.] [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 7:22 am
Wen’s name, or for that matter to start profiting by hawking T-shirts bearing his likeliness. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 8:21 am
" (Note that I followed the rule that you don't use accent marks on capital letters.) [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
” Advocates of women’s registration often frame the issue as a matter of either burden sharing or improving military effectiveness—but policymakers and the public should also understand that women’s inclusion in the draft could fundamentally alter women’s position in society for the better. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
If Burr traded stocks based on information that was not available to the public, it could not only be an ethics issue, but a criminal matter as well. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
Tennessee defended its apportionment scheme not only on the basis of Colegrove, but on the premise that it infringed upon its own state constitution and was therefore not a matter federal courts could rule on. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:51 am
In the Matter of Mark T. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
When asked on a press call why Facebook was treating COVID-19 misinformation differently, Mark Zuckerberg invoked the First Amendment trope that “you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
The case settled, but court filings that indicated the settlement amount were place under seal; two local media outlets intervened to get the matter unsealed. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
Shaffer executed a will that set up a trust for his two sons, Mark and Terry. [read post]
