Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 52,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
With former DA Michael Nifong's ethical lapses and eventual disbarment receiving national headlines over the past year or so, we found the case of People v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:47 pm
The New York case of People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
The main difference between Nokia v IPCom is this, though: the characters in soap operas are not real people: their often bizarre and chaotic responses to the positions in which they find themselves are scripted and deprive them of any freedom of action. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Colby & Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:35 am
Today’s opinion resolved three cases that were argued together on the first day of the term: Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
In Fonovisa, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
In Arista v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 9:03 am
Case citation: Reflex Media Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
Cites to decade-old cases MA v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:47 am
HSE v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:27 am
We have just learned that Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
The GAL will typically meet with all relevant parties involved in a case, including both parents and any other people who may have a significant influence on the child's well-being. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 1:19 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals handed down Hays v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
– Court Puts Brakes on Bus Accident Case, March 18, 2016, Fort Myers Trucking Accident Lawyer Blog The post Moreno v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Writing for the majority in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm
The Supreme Court has found that at least a dozen laws lacked a rational basis (some are equal protection cases such as Quinn v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
With respect to the merits of defendant's contention that a Frye hearing was required, it is well settled that expert testimony concerning CSAAS is admissible to assist the jury in understanding the unusual conduct of victims of child sexual abuse provided that, as here, the testimony is general in nature and does "not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred" (People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387; see People v Gillard, 7 AD3d… [read post]
