Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 19,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm
If US public opinion reaches a similar consensus, few people would care about the details of abortion jurisprudence, so long as it doesn't bar the policies favored by that consensus. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
This is a long-running and vitriolic dispute between James Ryan and Yvonne Johnson. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
Haven’t run regressions yet or compared much (literary works v. nonliterary works). [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
However, the long-term implications of this case aren’t entirely clear because the Supreme Court voted 3-1-3: three justices on a plurality opinion, 3 justices (in 2 opinions) in dissent, and a swing-vote concurrence by Justice Kruger. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
Will Gill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
Rivera v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm
D'ALESSANDRO v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm
The system in Alberta was challenged on similar grounds in R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
They sued claiming the companies’ advertising was deceptive, and sought certification of a nationwide class of about 30,000 people. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
We thought it was kind of funny, but people who work in that office are not laughing. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
Gay-Straight Alliance of Yulee High School v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
” People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
The civil cases also went down in tort history long ago. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
