Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 3641 - 3660 of 13,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The government has also jailed political opponents, which the European Court of Human Rights has recognized, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the extensions of detention of a political opposition leader had pursued the predominant ulterior purpose of stifling pluralism and limiting freedom of political debate, a core component of a democratic society. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
” And if we let that mindset creep in, that’s really a poor mindset to have in terms of politics, but even more importantly, it’s a poor mindset to have in terms of life. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Ruth Levush
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
Pritzker (D) that limited most social gatherings to 50 people but exempted religious organizations and houses of worship. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The American political system is inefficient by design. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
City of Philadelphia—about if a city can choose not to contract with an adoption agency because that agency will not work with gay couples, and argues that the Supreme Court may upend protections for LGBTQ Americans by reframing religious liberty as an equality issue, allowing people with religious objections to serving, hiring, or marrying LGBTQ people the ability to do so. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]