Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 3641 - 3660 of 6,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 14 January 2011, the Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ heard the appeals of the claimant in the privacy anonymity cases of JIH v News Group (No.1) ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) and (No. 2) ([2010] EWHC 2979 (QB)). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of  Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:05 pm
FWIW, my personal Wikipedia page was crunched and rolled into a general criticism of Wikipedia page. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Tarceva (Erlotinib) – India: Delhi High Court Appellate Bench holds in favour of Cipla against Roche in Tarceva patent litigation; Roche fined for ‘material suppression’ (Spicy IP) (PatLit) (Patent Circle) (Spicy IP) (Patent Circle) (Patent Circle) (GenericsWeb) Lovenox (Enoxaparin) – US: Supreme Court… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
XYT and BWE v Associated Newspapers [2015] EWHC 1162 (QB)) (see Inforrm case comment) AMC v News Group Newspapers([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) (see the Inforrm case comment) Dedicoat v News Group Newspapers, 27 October 2015. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Above the Law Don’t Roll The Dice On Defamation Suits Against Gripe Sites, Especially In California–Ocean’s Eleven v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm by Deborah Darin
Smith holds his own and rolls with the interruptions. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
This court is not prepared to roll back the tide of history. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  We’ll exclude purely entertainment media (see our rock 'n roll post for some of that) and stick to cases where somebody alleged detrimental reliance of some sort on published information ( [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
The latest decision of the Supreme Court on this subject is an unmissable opportunity to consider another famous moment from Pulp Fiction.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
The latest decision of the Supreme Court on this subject is an unmissable opportunity to consider another famous moment from Pulp Fiction.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]