Search for: "STEVENS v. STATE" Results 3641 - 3660 of 7,050
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
It stated: –          The website was owned by someone called “Steven”, who was not a paying customer, but had won their hosting as part of a competition; –          Goss PC Repairs had since shut down; and –          he had received no communications with the actual website owner. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:23 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a gender discrimination case argued two weeks ago. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
  Justice Stevens wrote the opinion. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Justice Breyer issued a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Stevens. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Stevens, issued an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:16 am by Marcia Coyle
Article V states that an amendment must either be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Journalists are not defenseless, the SJC pointed out, citing the seminal libel case, New York Times v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Choice between federal and state courts implicates fundamental questions of fairness [Eric Alexander, Drug and Device Law on Supreme Court certiorari petition in Pfizer v. [read post]