Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Edward T. Kang
Rule 408 Precludes Some Settlement Evidence From Being Admitted The Federal Rule of Evidence 408 is the model for many state court rules. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
” The European Commission has moved swiftly to confirm that the Privacy Shield does not rely on the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm by David Doniger
The bill would annul the common law rights that every state has had for more than 100 years (since the Supreme Court’s decision in Georgia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
It also gives the state and cities the right to file suit against companies over misclassification, overriding the arbitration agreements that many businesses use to shield themselves from worker complaints. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Comment k intends to shield from strict liability products which cannot be designed more safely; however, if such products are mismanufactured or unaccompanied by adequate warnings, then the seller may be liable.Toner, 732 P.2d at 305 (footnote omitted). [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Parliament has issued a non-binding resolution to the EU Commission to suspend the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Rate limits cap the overall rates that can be set by local policymakers, but do not shield properties from increases due to rising values or from other policies designed to increase collections. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:17 pm by Kathleen Scott
In the Memorandum, the President stated that it was important that this designation process be transparent, promote market discipline and reduce systemic risk because these “determinations and designations have serious implications for affected entities, the industries in which they operate and the economy at large. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:51 am by CMLP Staff
This ruling puts New Hampshire in agreement with a long line of cases from other states providing these important protections. [read post]