Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
United States, holding that the pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant’s untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to retain counsel of choice. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:51 pm
Ford: Two of the Three Issues Raised in the Petition are Not Dependent on the United States Supreme Court's Opinion in Williams III California Supreme Court Grants Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
In the matter King v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Justice Kennedy sums up my view of the state’s argument with this beaut: JUSTICE KENNEDY: You’re representing the State of California and you want to establish the proposition that any time there is a traffic stop in the State of California or I guess anywhere in the United States all the passengers are free to immediately leave, absent some further countermanding officer — order by the officer. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
LLP (real party in interest or Dentons), a major law firm with offices throughout the United States. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Iskanian 14-341Issue: Whether an employee’s waiver in an arbitration agreement of a collective or “representative action” under the California Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:55 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that that the plaintiffs had standing, but concluded that the investors failed to allege facts showing that the public statements were material in their decisions to purchase CCIV. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, constitutional adjudication does not work that way. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 am
United States Marshals Service, 2014 U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
Volante writes: Recently, in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
Cal. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
