Search for: "State v. Back" Results 3641 - 3660 of 42,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 11:23 pm by Dan Flynn
BPI asked the federal court to remand the case back to the state. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:20 am by John Hochfelder
Both the liability finding and the damages award were upheld on appeal last week in Ramos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
GSK refutes this saying that it meets the two-part ripeness test established in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
Emerging, blinking, from the dark confines of the pile of examination scripts that he has called his home for the past few weeks (which in the best cases have been a joy to behold and in the worst a veritable papier-mâché bunker of Babel), this Kat has spent a rather pleasant afternoon easing himself back into the real world again by digesting the latest judgment from Mr Justice Floyd: Cephalon v Orchid & Mylan [2011] EWHC 1591 (Pat).Cephalon and its subsidiaries… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
  After the first opinion was published in late 2018 at 30 Cal.App.5th 630 (see my December 26, 2018 post on that decision here), the Supreme Court granted and transferred the cause back to the Third District for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Friends of Eel River v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:55 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
No one spoke either on the way back to the car or after the shooting. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1979, in Jackson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Scott told the reporter interviewing him: 'I don't mind not going back to the States. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
No Dar/No FAR.If you do something bad and then sue someone, and they sue you back, the anti-SLAPP statute might apply. [read post]