Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Brunton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
Member States shall provide for authors, in respect of the original of their works or of copies thereof, the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any form of distribution to the public by sale or otherwise. 2. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Its reliance on Vaudable [v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
That in itself is a heinous crime BY the State to deny a minor the legal protections and immunities to which one is, and has always been, entitled. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Holder and Horne v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:08 am
This approach is entirely at odds with current Spanish jurisprudence – in particular the decision in Audiencia Nacional of Quedelibros v SGAE (decision here; discussed here, both in Spanish) which stated that it is against the law to treat these intermediaries as autonomous infringers without taking into account the status of the owner of the website who hosts the material. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Standard of review from Minister of Health is correctness Pfizer Canada v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:54 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Holder invalidating the coverage formula for the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance provisions or its upholding of Indiana’s unnecessary and onerous voter ID law in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
United States, No. 14-378. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:06 am
Holder [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Roper, 14-6873, becomes our new title holder. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:27 pm
The royalty base.Even Judge Robart held in the Microsoft v. [read post]
